Submitted by Mary Christine
There is a straightforward, common-sense way to prevent dangerous AI that tech executives and politicians refuse to discuss.
If an engineer released traditional malware that hacked websites, stole proprietary data, or scraped illegal imagery, law enforcement would not debate existential risk—they would issue an arrest warrant. Yet, leading AI labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX/xAI get a pass by pushing doomsday sci-fi narratives and lobbying for toothless oversight panels instead of standard corporate criminal liability.
In this video, I break down why AI guardrails are a theater act, the reality behind recent web attacks and illicit training sets, and how imposing basic criminal liability on developers and executives would instantly make AI safer.
Tweet
Continue reading...
[ H/T The Burning Platform ]
There is a straightforward, common-sense way to prevent dangerous AI that tech executives and politicians refuse to discuss.
If an engineer released traditional malware that hacked websites, stole proprietary data, or scraped illegal imagery, law enforcement would not debate existential risk—they would issue an arrest warrant. Yet, leading AI labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX/xAI get a pass by pushing doomsday sci-fi narratives and lobbying for toothless oversight panels instead of standard corporate criminal liability.
In this video, I break down why AI guardrails are a theater act, the reality behind recent web attacks and illicit training sets, and how imposing basic criminal liability on developers and executives would instantly make AI safer.
Tweet
Continue reading...
[ H/T The Burning Platform ]
