How Did James Talarico Get 2.1 MILLION More Votes Than Barack Obama In Texas?

I’ve been letting the dust settle after Midterm Elections because I didn’t want to just rush in with “THE ELECTION WAS RIGGED AND STOLEN!” and so I’ve been taking my time, letting the dust settle, and now it’s time to start digging in.

And we’re going to start with this one in Texas.

Goofy James “Talafreako” somehow garnered 5.4 million votes in Texas, but that means nothing until you put it into context.

And the context is that Barack Hussein Obama, the most beloved Democrat in the last 50 years, only got 3.3 million votes in Texas when he last ran in 2012.

That’s 2.1 million more votes for Talafreako or in percentage terms thats 65% more than Hussein.

Here’s how it looks on a chart:

How is Talarico 65% more popular in Texas than Obama was? pic.twitter.com/LJOHCJlq30

— JKash

MAGA Queen (@JKash000) November 11, 2026

Click to expand...

Now a couple follow up questions, because we like to do our homework around here and present you with the FULL story.

Question 1: is this accurate?

As you know, we don’t write articles based on one Tweet.

We actually do our homework.

And the homework confirms that yes, the raw numbers and math on the percentages is accurate.

Confirmed.

More on that below.

Question 2: is there an explanation for this beyond just “obvious cheating”?

Possibly, yes.

Below is what Grok told me when I asked both of these questions.

Grok confirms the numbers and the math are both real, but then offers an explanation: Grok says Texas has grown from 13.6 million voters in 2012 to about 19 million voters in 2026, and we all know that the Democrats are importing blue voters into red states as fast as they can ship them like cattle.

So could that explain it?

Maybe, but it still feels like quite a stunning jump to me.

From Grok:

Yes, the raw numbers in the chart are accurate.

Official results confirm:

• Barack Obama received 3,308,124 votes in Texas in the 2012 presidential election (about 41.4% of the vote).
• James Talarico received roughly 5.44–5.45 million votes in the 2026 Texas U.S. Senate race (about 55% of the vote), according to unofficial Texas Secretary of State totals and multiple election trackers. The specific figure of 5,444,982 appears in several sources matching the chart.

5,444,982 ÷ 3,308,124 ≈ 1.65, so Talarico’s total is about 65% higher in absolute votes.

That said, the comparison has important context:

• Texas had grown substantially. Registered voters rose from roughly 13.6 million in 2012 to a record ~19 million by 2026.
• 2026 was a midterm in which Democrats performed strongly across Texas statewide races (a “blue wave” relative to recent cycles), while 2012 was a presidential year in which Obama lost Texas by about 16 points.
• Absolute vote totals can rise with population growth, higher registration, and turnout even if the underlying political composition of the state shifts more gradually.

The arithmetic claim is correct; whether it implies “65% more popular” depends on how one interprets popularity versus changes in the size of the electorate and the specific election environment.

Click to expand...

I’d love to hear what you think!

Real or evidence of massive voter fraud?

Continue reading...

[ H/T WLT Report ]