New Hampshire just won an emergency election-law victory at the Supreme Court with less than two weeks to go before the November 3 midterms.
The Court on Thursday granted the state’s request to pause two lower-court orders that had restricted how officials could enforce New Hampshire’s new student-ID voting guidance.
The result: the state’s rules excluding student identification cards as proof of identity can remain in force while the appeal moves forward.
The first alert captured the ruling and the lone noted dissent.
The case is Scanlan v. Coalition for Open Democracy, No. 26A512.
New Hampshire’s House Bill 323 removed high school, college and university IDs from the list of documents that automatically qualify as voter identification. The law took effect June 2.
But the lower-court fight involved a narrower and more complicated question than whether a student ID must be accepted on its own.
U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante left HB 323 itself in place. He separately blocked state guidance that prevented local election officials from considering a student ID alongside other evidence when a voter used New Hampshire’s fallback identity-verification procedures.
That distinction is what reached the Supreme Court on an emergency basis.
The Court said lower federal courts ordinarily should not alter election rules on the eve of an election and concluded that the district court had not identified a reason to depart from that principle.
A court reporter linked the order while summarizing what the stay does.
New Hampshire Bulletin reported that the state’s accepted IDs include a driver’s license issued by any state, a U.S. passport, a military ID and other government-issued identification, including a New Hampshire non-driver ID.
The state argued that student cards are less reliable because they may lack expiration dates and anti-counterfeiting features. It also warned that forcing another statewide change in election guidance so close to November 3 would create confusion for voters and poll workers.
The challengers countered that some students do not have a driver’s license or passport readily available and may have difficulty reaching a DMV office. They contend that the restriction burdens young voters and violates the First, Fourteenth and Twenty-Sixth Amendments.
The voting-rights group following the case called Thursday’s order a loss for voters and emphasized the practical effect on students who lack another qualifying ID.
BREAKING: In a loss for voters, the Supreme Court ruled to bar New Hampshire election officials from considering student IDs as evidence of identity when registering and voting during the midterms.
The broader ban on automatically accepting student IDs as valid photo ID also… pic.twitter.com/qseVwZefnQ
— Democracy Docket (@DemocracyDocket) October 22, 2026
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only justice identified as dissenting in the official order. The Court did not publish a full justice-by-justice vote tally.
Jackson argued that the lower court had not changed New Hampshire law. In her view, it ordered the secretary of state to correct public statements and guidance that could mislead voters and election workers about what the law permits.
She wrote that stopping material misrepresentations about election rules would prevent confusion rather than cause it.
The Supreme Court’s order and Jackson’s dissent make clear that this is a temporary stay, not a final decision on the constitutional challenge.
The stay will remain in effect while the case proceeds in the First Circuit and through any timely petition asking the Supreme Court to take up the merits.
If the Court denies review, the stay ends automatically. If it grants review, the stay lasts until the justices send down their judgment.
For the November 3 election, however, the immediate question is settled: New Hampshire may enforce the challenged student-ID guidance.
That gives election officials one set of rules to administer—and hands the state a significant voter-ID win at the most consequential moment on the calendar.
Read the full Supreme Court ruling here:
This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.
The post BREAKING: Supreme Court Clears New Hampshire To Enforce Student ID Voting Rules Ahead Of Midterms appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.
Continue reading...
[H/T 100PercentFedUp]
