The Collective Is The Enemy Of Community
Authored by Thaddeus G. McCotter via American Greatness,
The Democratic Socialists of America exploit young people's longing for community, but socialism's coercive collectivism destroys the voluntary relationships that sustain it.
Whether reflecting on the impersonal essence of "virtual reality" and the incessant stream of demands and anxieties it imposes upon our diurnal, increasingly alienated existence, or listening to the concerns of one's fellow citizens, one hears a persistent leitmotif: the longing for true community, especially among the youth.

One aspect of this longing has been well bruited: people's gnawing sense that the myth of "virtual community" is an alienating illusion that increasingly leaves them numb and pining for personal engagements - the flesh-and-blood amities, intimacies, and sundry other encounters of true community.
Exacerbating this sense of loss, especially among the young, people are very concerned about "affordability" - such as the inability to purchase a new home, rent an apartment, find an entry-level job, or keep the one they already have - due to the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and inflation. But too often overlooked is how the diminishment of these opportunities has reduced people's personal interaction and the sense of community it brings.
Indeed, when people, notably youth, talk about wanting to "shop locally," support small businesses, or even reject "corporate" entities and their culture, it is not a complete rejection of capitalism. Indeed, one can clearly recognize young people's embrace of free markets and small businesses. Yet, it is a practical complaint regarding its failures - one of which is its eclipse of community beneath an impersonal corporatism. (One can make the argument that today's youth are essentially the political descendants of Jeffersonian Republicans, but I digress.)
Naturally, one group that has not overlooked young people's yearning for a greater sense of community is the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). They exacerbate youth's disaffection with the economy by equating corporatism and capitalism and proffer socialism as a virtuous panacea for economic ailments. And, for alienated people yearning for community, the DSA conflates and substitutes the collective for community.
But the truth is the collective is the enemy of community.
As Robert Nisbet warned in his seminal work, The Quest for Community: A Study in the Ethics of Order and Freedom:
It is a false promise.
Under socialism, the "warm embrace" of the collective is created by an omnipotent, centralized government. It relies upon coercion, not consent. In addition to crushing an individual's agency and ability to dissent, it destroys the voluntary intermediate institutions that form a community and insulate and protect the individual from the domination of the centralized government.
As Nisbet explained, the destruction of these intermediate institutions is imperative for would-be authoritarians:
The antithesis and antidote to the collective is community.
Community requires individual consent, agency, voluntary associations, and governmental subsidiarity. This is decidedly different from the strawman argument proffered by socialists that the choice is between the collective and a calloused "rugged individualism." While deceptive, such an argument makes a cynical sense, because subscribing to the DSA's agenda would leave someone just a coerced cog in the collective, not a consensual member of a true community.
Once more, Nisbet writes in his book, The Sociological Tradition:
And is it not the aim of all radicals, including the DSA, to destroy root and branch the foundations of an established civilization?
Is it not to fundamentally eradicate all individual agency and consensual, intermediate communal relationships to impose their radical ideological dictates to perfect humanity and create Utopia?
Is it not, as Nisbet avers, to make sure "man's alienation from man must lead in time to man's alienation from God," and from community into the chill grip of the iron fist of the collective?
Tyler Durden Mon, 10/12/2026 - 23:25
Continue reading...
[ H/T ZeroHedge ]
Authored by Thaddeus G. McCotter via American Greatness,
The Democratic Socialists of America exploit young people's longing for community, but socialism's coercive collectivism destroys the voluntary relationships that sustain it.
Whether reflecting on the impersonal essence of "virtual reality" and the incessant stream of demands and anxieties it imposes upon our diurnal, increasingly alienated existence, or listening to the concerns of one's fellow citizens, one hears a persistent leitmotif: the longing for true community, especially among the youth.

One aspect of this longing has been well bruited: people's gnawing sense that the myth of "virtual community" is an alienating illusion that increasingly leaves them numb and pining for personal engagements - the flesh-and-blood amities, intimacies, and sundry other encounters of true community.
Exacerbating this sense of loss, especially among the young, people are very concerned about "affordability" - such as the inability to purchase a new home, rent an apartment, find an entry-level job, or keep the one they already have - due to the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and inflation. But too often overlooked is how the diminishment of these opportunities has reduced people's personal interaction and the sense of community it brings.
Indeed, when people, notably youth, talk about wanting to "shop locally," support small businesses, or even reject "corporate" entities and their culture, it is not a complete rejection of capitalism. Indeed, one can clearly recognize young people's embrace of free markets and small businesses. Yet, it is a practical complaint regarding its failures - one of which is its eclipse of community beneath an impersonal corporatism. (One can make the argument that today's youth are essentially the political descendants of Jeffersonian Republicans, but I digress.)
Naturally, one group that has not overlooked young people's yearning for a greater sense of community is the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). They exacerbate youth's disaffection with the economy by equating corporatism and capitalism and proffer socialism as a virtuous panacea for economic ailments. And, for alienated people yearning for community, the DSA conflates and substitutes the collective for community.
But the truth is the collective is the enemy of community.
As Robert Nisbet warned in his seminal work, The Quest for Community: A Study in the Ethics of Order and Freedom:
It is a false promise.
Under socialism, the "warm embrace" of the collective is created by an omnipotent, centralized government. It relies upon coercion, not consent. In addition to crushing an individual's agency and ability to dissent, it destroys the voluntary intermediate institutions that form a community and insulate and protect the individual from the domination of the centralized government.
As Nisbet explained, the destruction of these intermediate institutions is imperative for would-be authoritarians:
The antithesis and antidote to the collective is community.
Community requires individual consent, agency, voluntary associations, and governmental subsidiarity. This is decidedly different from the strawman argument proffered by socialists that the choice is between the collective and a calloused "rugged individualism." While deceptive, such an argument makes a cynical sense, because subscribing to the DSA's agenda would leave someone just a coerced cog in the collective, not a consensual member of a true community.
Once more, Nisbet writes in his book, The Sociological Tradition:
And is it not the aim of all radicals, including the DSA, to destroy root and branch the foundations of an established civilization?
Is it not to fundamentally eradicate all individual agency and consensual, intermediate communal relationships to impose their radical ideological dictates to perfect humanity and create Utopia?
Is it not, as Nisbet avers, to make sure "man's alienation from man must lead in time to man's alienation from God," and from community into the chill grip of the iron fist of the collective?
Tyler Durden Mon, 10/12/2026 - 23:25
Continue reading...
[ H/T ZeroHedge ]