• Welcome to the New Conservative Angle!

    We're excited to introduce a new era for our readership.

    For years, Conservative Angle has served as a clearinghouse for news, commentary, and analysis from across the conservative movement. Thousands of readers have visited these pages to stay informed, discover new voices, and keep pace with the stories shaping our nation and our world.

    Today, we are building on that foundation.

    The new Conservative Angle is more than a news aggregator. It is a community.

    Our mission remains the same: to provide access to important stories, encourage informed discussion, and promote the free exchange of ideas. But now, readers have a place to participate, share perspectives, ask questions, and openly and respectfully engage directly with fellow conservatives and independent thinkers.

    As Conservative Angle grows, we will continue adding new features, new content, and new ways for readers to participate. The site will evolve over time based on the interests, ideas, and contributions from the community.

    Whether you are a longtime visitor or discovering Conservative Angle for the first time, we invite you to become part of the conversation.

    Register for an account, introduce yourself to the community, and join the discussions that matter most to you. Together, we can create a place where news is not merely consumed, but examined, debated, and understood.

    Thank you for your patience during our transition and for your continued support.

    Welcome to the new Conservative Angle.

    — The Conservative Angle Team

Senate panel delays critical vote to advance Blanche attorney general nomination

AP26196664659474.jpg


Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche‘s confirmation process to permanently remain in the position was set back on Wednesday when a key Senate committee postponed a key vote advancing his nomination.

A spokesperson for the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is led by Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA), suggested Wednesday’s vote was pushed back because Blanche lacks the support necessary to advance his nomination. Several Republicans on the committee, including Sens. Thom Tillis (R-NC) and John Cornyn (R-TX), are on the fence on whether to vote for Blanche due to the Department of Justice’s controversial “anti-weaponization fund,” which aims to recompense individuals the White House believes were targeted for political reasons.

“Chairman Grassley works to set President Trump’s nominees up for success in committee, not failure,” the spokesperson said. “Senators Cornyn and Tillis want written assurances from the Department of Justice regarding the Trump-IRS settlement. Tomorrow’s markup is postponed as work continues to secure sufficient support in committee to favorably report Attorney General-nominee Todd Blanche, who is highly qualified for the job.”

According to sources familiar with the situation, the DOJ has transmitted a new response to Cornyn and Tillis that addresses their concerns. A DOJ official told the Washington Examiner that the department provided a written proposal to Cornyn’s staff on Tuesday “following ongoing discussion with both the Committee and the Senator’s office.” The official said, “We look forward to further discussion around any outstanding concerns.”

Following the postponed hearing, the official added that the department “has been in regular communication with Committee members for weeks” and looks forward to addressing any additional concerns.

Earlier in the day, Cornyn told reporters he was scheduled to meet with Blanche on Wednesday morning, but the meeting never took place. Cornyn said he and his staff provided the DOJ with a “red-line strikeout” outlining potential changes.

“I don’t know whether there’ll be a markup tomorrow,” Cornyn later added.

CORNYN CANCELS MEETING WITH BLANCHE MEANT TO ADDRESS CONCERNS SO CONFIRMATION VOTE CAN PROCEED

Tillis, who has raised similar concerns about the fund, was also not a certain vote for Blanche. “He’s not walking away from it,” Tillis said Wednesday of Cornyn. “He’s just being realistic about planning a markup.”

Cornyn is pressing the DOJ to spell out how broadly the settlement’s audit-immunity provision would apply, including whether it would shield recipients from enforcement by agencies beyond the IRS and Treasury Department.

Continue reading...

[ H/T Washington Examiner ]
  • Reading time 4 min read
  • Views11
  • Reading time 4 min read
  • Views9
  • Reading time 2 min read
  • Views10
  • Reading time 2 min read
  • Views12
  • Reading time 2 min read
  • Views12
  • Reading time 3 min read
  • Views13

Comments

There are no comments to display
Back
Top