Secretary of State Marco Rubio reportedly ordered Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and his delegation to leave New York after indirect negotiations between the United States and Iran stalled, adding another sharp turn to an already dangerous confrontation.
Axios reported Thursday, citing a U.S. official and another source familiar with the situation, that Rubio issued the order Monday. The Associated Press separately reported that two U.S. officials said Rubio directed the Iranian delegation to leave earlier than planned.
Iran strongly disputes that version of events.
Iran’s mission to the United Nations said the delegation departed according to a schedule that had been communicated to the State Department on September 17. That denial is important: The claim that Rubio expelled the delegation rests on reporting attributed to unnamed U.S. officials and has not been acknowledged by Iran.
A second source said Washington demanded the delegation leave, while also noting that Araghchi had already planned to depart.
The Iranian delegation left New York early Tuesday. Axios reported that Araghchi and the other Iranian officials boarded a 1:20 a.m. flight to Doha, Qatar.
The departure came as Qatar continued carrying messages between Washington and Tehran. The indirect discussions have covered several high-stakes issues, including the Strait of Hormuz, the wider conflict, Iran’s nuclear program and potential economic relief.
Those talks now appear stuck on a basic but crucial question: Who moves first?
Reuters reported Wednesday that Iran had proposed a seven-day trust-building plan and received American feedback through Qatari mediators. The two sides disagree less about the requested steps than about which side must move first.
President Donald Trump rejected Iran’s proposal as insufficient.
The latest diplomatic breakdown is unfolding alongside a fresh warning from the president that the United States could intensify its military campaign.
Bloomberg captured the escalation warning from Trump as the diplomatic channel remained stalled.
In a Time interview published Thursday, Trump said it was “possible” that the United States could ramp up bombing after the November 3 midterm elections. He did not identify any potential targets, and his answer stopped short of announcing a new operation.
Still, the timing and wording will command attention in Tehran and across the Middle East. Trump is leaving the military option plainly visible while his administration presses Iran through indirect diplomacy and additional economic penalties.
Trump also said the United States had spent the past six months replenishing its weapons stocks. That statement signals that the administration is thinking beyond the immediate round of talks and preparing for the possibility of a longer confrontation.
The Pentagon buildup makes that warning more than abstract.
Washington is still negotiating while maintaining military and economic pressure.
The administration added another layer Thursday when the Associated Press reported new U.S. sanctions targeting Iran’s automotive and rail sectors. The sanctions arrived as negotiators struggled to bridge their differences and as the dispute over the Iranian delegation’s departure spilled into public view.
For the Trump administration, the challenge is to force meaningful concessions without allowing Iran to use an extended negotiating process to buy time. For Tehran, the challenge is to obtain economic relief and security assurances without appearing to surrender under American military pressure.
The Strait of Hormuz makes the stakes even higher. Any prolonged disruption or escalation surrounding that critical waterway could have consequences far beyond the immediate combatants.
That is one reason Qatar’s role as an intermediary remains so important even after this latest setback.
There is also a major difference between stalled negotiations and terminated negotiations. Qatar is still passing messages.
Iran submitted a proposal, and the United States responded. The parties remain divided, but the diplomatic channel has not disappeared.
At the same time, the reported removal order, Trump’s rejection of the seven-day plan, new sanctions and the president’s bombing warning all point in the same direction: The room for a quick compromise is shrinking.
Rubio’s reported action would mark a particularly blunt signal that the administration was dissatisfied with the pace or substance of the talks. But because Iran says its officials followed a previously disclosed travel schedule, the exact circumstances of the delegation’s departure remain contested.
The United States and Iran continue to communicate. They still have not resolved the sequence problem at the center of the proposed trust-building arrangement.
Neither side wants to give up leverage first.
Trump, meanwhile, is pairing that diplomatic pressure with public uncertainty about what comes next. He did not promise a post-election escalation.
He said additional bombing was possible, declined to name targets and emphasized that American weapons supplies had been replenished.
That leaves Iran facing a familiar Trump strategy: negotiate under pressure, understand that the offer on the table may not improve, and do not assume the president’s military threats are empty.
Whether that pressure produces a deal or another round of strikes now depends on whether Washington and Tehran can agree on more than the destination. They must also agree on who takes the first step to get there.
Continue reading...
[ H/T WLT Report ]
