Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy just said something the political and media establishment desperately does not want said out loud.
He named the Muslim Brotherhood as a civilizational wrecking ball.
And almost on cue, the press responded by stripping away the context, hunting for exceptions to one sweeping sentence, and pretending Kennedy had attacked an ethnicity instead of an ideology.
I agree with Kennedy on the central point.
The Muslim Brotherhood is not a harmless civic club. It is a transnational Islamist movement whose branches have supported terrorism, fed grievance politics, and helped turn once-vibrant societies toward repression, fanaticism, and war.
Kennedy was right to confront it plainly.
The clip is blunt. It is also only one piece of Kennedy’s argument.
As Hannity reported, Kennedy was campaigning in Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Republican Senate nominee Mike Rogers when he turned to the Brotherhood.
Rogers has made the organization an issue in his closing argument against Democrat Abdul El-Sayed, who denies allegations of personal or family ties to the group. Kennedy told the crowd that he had studied the Brotherhood for much of his life and understood its danger.
He began by drawing a distinction the media repeatedly refuses to make: criticizing the Muslim Brotherhood is not the same thing as attacking every Muslim. Kennedy argued that the movement’s ideology departed from traditional Islam and that its worst victims are the people living under its influence.
Kennedy described Islam’s golden age as an extraordinary era of books, art, literature, science, engineering, medicine, biology, and navigation. He reminded the audience that Muslim societies once preserved and expanded knowledge while much of the rest of the world lagged behind.
Then he argued that the Brotherhood’s ideology helped destroy that inheritance. His contrast was between a productive civilization and the political movement that replaced learning with grievance, violence, and victimization.
That context matters because it demolishes the lazy claim that Kennedy was declaring Arabs inherently incapable of achievement. His point was the opposite: a great intellectual tradition existed, and a destructive political ideology helped smother it.
The media’s preferred response was a prize-counting exercise.
The Associated Press assembled a list of Arab Nobel, Wolf, and Fields prize winners to show that Kennedy’s most categorical wording has literal exceptions.
The examples include Egyptian-American chemist Ahmed Zewail, Egyptian novelist Naguib Mahfouz, Yemeni journalist Tawakkol Karman, Jordanian-born chemist Omar Yaghi, and mathematician Michael Atiyah, who was of Lebanese descent. Those names establish that “none” is too absolute when read as a literal statistic.
AP also supplied context that undercuts the racial interpretation pushed by Kennedy’s loudest critics. It reported that he first praised the historic Muslim contribution to learning, then blamed the Brotherhood for severing modern societies from that tradition.
The report further noted that the Brotherhood was founded in Egypt in 1928, was banned there after the ouster of Mohamed Morsi, and has also been banned or designated a terrorist organization by several Arab governments. Those governments did not act because of anti-Arab prejudice; they acted because they regard the movement as a threat.
So yes, there are exceptional achievers.
But locating a handful of exceptional achievers does not answer Kennedy’s larger question: why have so many societies with immense human talent, enormous resources, and a magnificent scholarly inheritance been dragged backward by Islamism, authoritarianism, sectarianism, and perpetual grievance?
That is the argument the press does not want to touch.
It is much safer to scold Kennedy over phrasing than to examine the movement he was condemning.
The official record makes that evasion impossible.
In January, the U.S. Department of the Treasury designated the Egyptian and Jordanian branches of the Muslim Brotherhood as Specially Designated Global Terrorists for material support to Hamas. The State Department simultaneously designated the Lebanese branch as both a Foreign Terrorist Organization and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist.
Treasury said Brotherhood branches present themselves as legitimate civic organizations while supporting terrorist groups behind the scenes. The department described the January action as the beginning of a sustained campaign to disrupt Brotherhood violence and destabilization.
The department documented far more than offensive rhetoric. It said Egyptian Brotherhood members helped prospective fighters reach Gaza, kept Hamas informed of their movements, and raised money that was transferred to Hamas militants.
Treasury also said Jordan-linked Brotherhood elements had been involved in manufacturing rockets, explosives, and drones, along with recruitment and illegal fundraising. It tied both branches to material support for Hamas under the federal government’s counterterrorism authority.
No honest reading of that record can reduce the Brotherhood to a misunderstood political movement.
It is an ideological network with blood on its hands.
President Trump recognized the threat before the media was willing to admit it. His Executive Order 14362 described the Brotherhood as a transnational network whose branches in Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon had supported violence and destabilization.
The order cited the Lebanese branch’s participation alongside Hamas, Hezbollah, and other factions in rocket attacks against Israeli civilian and military targets after October 7. It also cited an Egyptian Brotherhood leader’s call for violent attacks against American partners and interests.
Trump directed the State and Treasury departments to evaluate and pursue terrorist designations for the relevant branches. The order made eliminating their capabilities, depriving them of resources, and protecting American nationals the explicit policy of the United States.
By January, the administration had converted that policy into formal designations. Further Treasury actions followed against Brotherhood officials, financial facilitators, and organizations accused of moving money to Hamas.
Those are the facts Kennedy’s critics would rather bury beneath a semantic controversy.
Listen to the full argument and Kennedy’s meaning is unmistakable.
He was not denying the greatness of historic Muslim civilization. He was mourning its destruction.
He was not saying biology determines destiny. He was saying ideology can poison a culture.
And he was not blaming ordinary people for the movement that oppresses and exploits them. He said the Brotherhood’s greatest victims are the people trapped in the societies it has captured.
That is a moral argument, not a racial one.
A movement that elevates grievance over achievement, martyrdom over life, religious control over free inquiry, and ideological conformity over honest debate will inevitably crush human potential.
It will drive away innovators and silence dissenters. It will subordinate women and persecute religious minorities.
It will teach generations that failure is always somebody else’s fault.
And then, when the results become impossible to hide, its defenders will accuse anyone who notices of bigotry.
Kennedy refused to play that game.
His language was unsparing because the threat is real. The Brotherhood and its affiliates have spent decades hiding radical political aims behind respectable labels, charities, student organizations, and claims of victimhood.
Calling that strategy dangerous is not Islamophobia.
It is a defense of Muslims, Christians, Jews, secular reformers, women, dissidents, and every person who wants to live free of Islamist rule.
The media can tally prizes and manufacture outrage all day long.
It still cannot erase the terrorism designations, the Hamas links, the money trails, the weapons activity, or the wreckage left behind wherever political Islamism takes control.
RFK Jr. pointed at the real problem.
And the frantic effort to change the subject only proved how badly that problem needed to be named.
Continue reading...
[ H/T WLT Report ]
