President Trump is speaking out, and he seems to have made a marked shift since the Republican Midterm disaster.
He is no longer uncharacteristically quiet, but has begun to poke possible holes in what he called ‘looney tunes’ vote tallies.
One key repost on the President’s Truth Social account highlighted a theory that pins down a CONSISTENT vote shift across the board in every state in favor of Democrats.
I want to be clear — I have not heard President Trump claim specifically, as I am filing this report, that there was definitively widespread vote theft taking place last Tuesday.
But the number trends and the algorithmic consistencies he highlighted in the last few days, and specifically yesterday in a series of posts, is intriguing — to say the least.
One post shared by the President actually came a few days ago, hinting at the ‘steal’ vibe was in the air:
You have to admit — a jump in 20 million votes from one midterm to the next is massive.
And that’s even if you leave room for the illegals who likely voted this round.
And that’s particularly odd when you consider that Republican votes stayed almost identical; none gained OR lost.
But the key chart shared by President Trump came yesterday, claiming that there were algorithmic consistencies to the ‘shift’ towards blue, last Tuesday:
Here’s a screen shot of that chart for easier viewing:
President Trump shared that ‘15% band’ chart from the Truth is Freedom account on X:
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat…
pic.twitter.com/9cnJ5bAY54
— Truth Is Freedom (@TruthAnswersAll)
November 6, 2026
And here’s a full breakdown of the analysis of the math from that post, also shared by President Trump on Truth Social:
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
So, not only did the ‘multiplier’ for the shift from red to blue stay consistent…
But the CONSISTENCY wasn’t based on a proportional shift — which might seem more natural.
According to the chart and analysis shared by President Trump, the shift was consistent REGARDLESS of how blue or red a state had been to begin with!
That is why President Trump is being so insistent in the wake of last Tuesday calling for ballot-level recounts as compared with records kept from the polling locations, according to this from
Newsweek:
Trump reposted material on Truth Social questioning Democratic vote totals nationally and in Texas, including a post describing Gina Hinojosa’s performance in the Texas governor’s race as “Looney Tunes numbers.”
The activity marks a shift in tone from election night, when Trump acknowledged Republicans’ losses and said he would accept the results.
Later Saturday afternoon, Donald Trump shared additional posts questioning the results, including one that asked of a chart showing Texas Senate vote totals: “Does anyone believe this at all?”
Trump also shared a lengthy post claiming an unusually consistent shift toward Democrats across 59 Senate and gubernatorial races and calling for ballot-level scrutiny, including paper ballot hand counts and comparisons of poll-book records with votes counted.
One of the posts shared by Trump Saturday was from writer and commercial fisherman Donald Ward, who argued on X that unusually high Democratic turnout in Texas could not be explained by weak Republican participation.
“The problem is Gina Hinojosa gained 1.7 million votes more than Beto O’Rourke,” the post said. “Those are Looney Tunes numbers.” Ward added that if the turnout reflected genuine enthusiasm, “lines should have been around the block at every polling station.”
Minutes later, Trump shared another post, this one from Kevin Bass who writes about science, nutrition, history, and politics, featuring a chart comparing the nationwide House popular vote in 2022 with projected totals for 2026.
The accompanying chart listed 54.2 million Republican and 51.3 million Democratic House votes in 2022, compared with projected 2026 totals of 55.6 million Republican and 70.4 million Democratic votes. The graphic itself noted that the 2026 numbers were projections based on 85 percent of the expected vote being counted and estimated remaining ballots at the then-current rates.
In fact, I dug up this post from President Trump back on Tuesday night while the votes were still coming in.
This seems to indicate he was already suspecting something mathematical (and thus, systemic… not just additional ballots showing up all willy-nilly) might be in the works.
Check this out from election day, shared by President Trump, noting the weirdness of the vote in Texas with Talarico:
Here’s a screenshot of that post for easier viewing:
I don’t know if any of these numbers prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the digital fix was in.
But I know the consistent shadowing of those democrat numbers, algorithmically pacing the Republican numbers… is wild!
Meanwhile, the competing narrative is that Democrats just simply capitalized on Republican weakness, as covered here by
Reuters:
The strategy rested on a belief that the usual midterm backlash against the party in the White House would be amplified by voter frustration with Trump and the rising cost of living, creating an opportunity to expand the electoral map.
Democrats invested more broadly in party organizations across the country rather than concentrating resources in a handful of traditional battlegrounds.
“Do you invest in the battleground states or do you invest in all 57 state parties so you can organize year-round and organize to win anywhere?” Jane Kleeb, vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, said. “Obviously (DNC Chair Ken) Martin chose that we’re going to win everywhere and he got a lot of hell for it. People were calling for his head.”
The strategy rested on a belief that the usual midterm backlash against the party in the White House would be amplified by voter frustration with Trump and the rising cost of living, creating an opportunity to expand the electoral map.
Democrats invested more broadly in party organizations across the country rather than concentrating resources in a handful of traditional battlegrounds.
“Do you invest in the battleground states or do you invest in all 57 state parties so you can organize year-round and organize to win anywhere?” Jane Kleeb, vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, said. “Obviously (DNC Chair Ken) Martin chose that we’re going to win everywhere and he got a lot of hell for it. People were calling for his head.”
If you buy into that competing narrative, the only thing at play Tuesday was a highly-cohesive Democrat plan to put the right campaign dollars in the right hands at the right time.
You lost me at cohesive, as soon as I saw the word “Democrat” follow closely behind.
I’m sure there were a number of factors at play last Tuesday.
I know for a fact that the turbulence of gas prices and Iran have shaken the foundations of MAGA and Trump supporters.
And who can forget that Republicans in Congress literally sat on the SAVE ACT for TWO YEARS!
But 20 million votes show up, equally spaced with mathematic consistency, only on one side of the coin… regardless of the starting point of each individual state?
I’m with President Trump on this one: LOONEY TUNES.
Continue reading...
[ H/T WLT Report ]
