President Trump just opened the door to something few people expected to hear after the midterms: an immigration deal with Democrats.
And he did it while acknowledging that part of his own deportation policy may have gone too far.
The comments came during his first major interview since Republicans lost control of both chambers of Congress. Asked what he would like to accomplish with the incoming Democratic majority, the president answered that he would “love to do something on immigration.”
The exchange quickly became the most consequential moment of the interview:
President Trump did not repudiate the border crackdown that helped return him to office.
He drew a sharp line between closing the border, removing violent criminals and dealing with people who entered illegally years ago but have since held steady jobs, paid taxes and stayed out of serious trouble.
That distinction is now at the center of a potentially explosive fight inside the Republican coalition.
CBS News published the full transcript, including the post-election debate over enforcement, jobs and political fallout. President Trump credited his administration with shutting down the southern border and prioritizing murderers, rapists and drug dealers for removal.
He said the political damage came when enforcement swept up long-time workers whose only offense was entering the country illegally.
He pointed to hotel employees, cleaners, waitresses and landscaping workers as examples. Some, he noted, had lived in the United States for 10 or 15 years.
When the interviewer asked whether a deal could create some form of legal status for that group, President Trump answered yes. He called an agreement “actually doable” without offering legislative language, eligibility rules or a timetable.
The president also acknowledged that hard-liners inside his own administration favor removing everyone who entered illegally. His alternative would continue aggressive removals for dangerous offenders while working out separate terms for certain long-time residents.
That ambiguity matters.
There is a vast difference between a tightly drawn work-status program tied to background checks and enforcement, and a sweeping amnesty that rewards illegal entry with citizenship.
Sunday night produced no policy text. The mere possibility of a deal was enough to trigger an immediate warning from the right:
The White House moved quickly to push back on that interpretation.
Its Rapid Response account emphasized that the president never used the word “amnesty” during the exchange:
That response is accurate as far as the transcript goes. The president discussed working out a deal for certain long-time workers, but he did not call for blanket legalization, citizenship or a halt to deportations.
The policy machinery also appears to be moving in the opposite direction of a broad retreat.
CBS News reported that officials at the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement had received no order to scale back enforcement after the election or abandon the existing arrest campaign. ICE had been working toward a target of roughly 19,000 arrests per week, a goal set before voters went to the polls.
The White House said enforcement against criminal illegal aliens would continue, while DHS said ICE would not be backing away or slowing down.
Officials cited Stephen Miller’s elevation to chief of staff as evidence that the administration intends to keep the pressure on. One official told the network to expect the opposite of a post-election pullback.
Then there is Stephen Miller.
President Trump elevated the architect of his hard-line immigration agenda to White House chief of staff after the interview was recorded. Promoting Miller hardly signals an administration preparing to surrender control of the border.
The Associated Press noted the tension between the president’s comments and Miller’s promotion. Democrats are preparing to use their new congressional majorities to investigate ICE and DHS, while President Trump will retain control of the executive branch and the veto pen.
That creates a narrow and dangerous negotiating window.
Democrats will want a deal that reaches as many illegal immigrants as possible. Immigration hawks will demand proof that any accommodation does not become another magnet for illegal entry or another broken promise to voters who backed mass deportation.
For President Trump, the challenge is to preserve the defining achievement of his second term—a secured border—while deciding whether every person already here should be treated exactly the same.
If negotiations move forward, the details will decide everything.
Will eligibility be limited to people who arrived before a fixed date? Will applicants face criminal background checks, tax requirements and mandatory employment verification?
Will legal status exclude citizenship? Will any deal include stronger enforcement against future illegal entry?
The answers will decide whether this becomes a controlled settlement or a political betrayal.
President Trump has now said the crackdown helped and hurt his party. He has also said a deal with Democrats can be done.
The next move will show whether this was a post-election adjustment in tone—or the beginning of the biggest immigration battle of his presidency.
Continue reading...
[ H/T WLT Report ]
