• Welcome to the New Conservative Angle!

    We're excited to introduce a new era for our readership.

    For years, Conservative Angle has served as a clearinghouse for news, commentary, and analysis from across the conservative movement. Thousands of readers have visited these pages to stay informed, discover new voices, and keep pace with the stories shaping our nation and our world.

    Today, we are building on that foundation.

    The new Conservative Angle is more than a news aggregator. It is a community.

    Our mission remains the same: to provide access to important stories, encourage informed discussion, and promote the free exchange of ideas. But now, readers have a place to participate, share perspectives, ask questions, and openly and respectfully engage directly with fellow conservatives and independent thinkers.

    As Conservative Angle grows, we will continue adding new features, new content, and new ways for readers to participate. The site will evolve over time based on the interests, ideas, and contributions from the community.

    Whether you are a longtime visitor or discovering Conservative Angle for the first time, we invite you to become part of the conversation.

    Register for an account, introduce yourself to the community, and join the discussions that matter most to you. Together, we can create a place where news is not merely consumed, but examined, debated, and understood.

    Thank you for your patience during our transition and for your continued support.

    Welcome to the new Conservative Angle.

    — The Conservative Angle Team

New Act Named After Infamous Rogue Judge Introduced into Congress — Here’s What It Would Do

judge_boasberg010101.jpg

Rogue activist judges who overstep their boundaries have been a giant problem during President Trump’s second term.

So, Sen. Eric Schmitt is introducing an act that would curtail the persistent issue of judicial overreach.

His new piece of legislation would implement stronger measures to stop these activist judges from hijacking the MAGA agenda.

And, the funniest part is that it’s named after the infamous Judge James Boasberg.

Sen. Schmitt explained:

One year ago, the DOJ filed its judicial misconduct complaint against Judge Boasberg.

Today, I'm filing the BOASBERG Act to permanently block rogue judges from hijacking cases.

Impeach Judge Boasberg. Pass the BOASBERG Act.https://t.co/9ZiCrbbPaD

— Senator Eric Schmitt (@SenEricSchmitt) July 28, 2026


The BOASBERG Act stands for the “Blocking Overt Attempts at Shopping By Enforcing Randomization Guidelines Act.”

In a post on X, Fox News Politics provided an overview of exactly what this act would do:

BOASBERG ACT: Sen. Eric Schmitt introduces legislation named after the federal judge who has repeatedly clashed with the Trump administration — designed to end judge shopping in federal courts by requiring random case assignment.

The bill would prohibit chief judges from… pic.twitter.com/1vHTCrcQsz

— Fox News Politics (@foxnewspolitics) July 28, 2026


BOASBERG ACT: Sen. Eric Schmitt introduces legislation named after the federal judge who has repeatedly clashed with the Trump administration — designed to end judge shopping in federal courts by requiring random case assignment.

The bill would prohibit chief judges from influencing which cases they oversee, require public disclosure of assignment practices, and create penalties for anyone who meddles with the process. Courts would have 120 days to comply.

Schmitt called Judge James Boasberg “the poster child for a rogue judge” who “exposed serious loopholes in our judicial system.” Boasberg, an Obama appointee, has blocked Trump’s deportation efforts, halted visa restrictions, and landed the Signalgate case — drawing impeachment calls from Trump and a misconduct complaint from the Justice Department.

Sen. Schmitt summarized the key points of the bill in a follow-up post:

My bill does 3 main things:

1. Randomize case assignments for federal district and appeals courts.

2. Implement transparency measures to verify randomized assignments are actually being followed.

3. Reassign a case away from a judge if SCOTUS overrules him in that case. pic.twitter.com/KGKuQUCHgJ

— Senator Eric Schmitt (@SenEricSchmitt) July 28, 2026


Though he’s far from the only one, Judge Boasberg has become perhaps the most notorious out-of-control federal judge out there.

Fox News provided some additional background on why Sen. Schmitt’s new act is desperately needed:

Boasberg, who was first appointed to the federal bench by former President Barack Obama in 2010, has become a flashpoint for Republicans and the White House for his role in several high-profile cases against Trump and his administration during his two non-consecutive stints at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

It’s caused Trump to call for his impeachment and the Justice Department to file a misconduct claim against him.

Boasberg most recently blocked the State Department from restricting visas for foreign officials and other foreign nationals that the administration has accused of suppressing or helping suppress American free speech.

That latest move is just the tip of the iceberg in a long-running set of clashes between Boasberg and Trump.

Boasberg has been a key player in the administration’s attempt to deport Venezuelan migrants. He tried to temporarily block the administration’s fast-paced deportation of Venezuelan migrants that the White House alleged were Tren de Aragua gang members.

He later ordered the administration that the men had to be returned to the U.S. for violating due process in their removal.

Boasberg also landed the case surrounding “Signalgate,” where top members of Trump’s Cabinet, including Vice President JD Vance, War Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and then-National Security Advisor Michael Waltz, among others, accidentally included a journalist in their encrypted group message discussing strikes in Yemen.

He ordered the administration to preserve any of the messages related to the group chat, but stopped short of requiring that the administration salvage any that may have been deleted.

Schmitt hopes that his legislation will create a new operating standard moving forward.

“The BOASBERG Act prevents judges from forcing their way onto cases and is an important piece of court transparency legislation that will help restore the American people’s confidence in our judiciary,” Schmitt said.

What do you think?

Do you support passing the BOASBERG Act?

Continue reading...

[ H/T WLT Report ]

Comments

There are no comments to display
Back
Top