Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Reportedly Speaks Out — Claims He Was Targeted for Being a Black Republican

Lindsay Clancy appearing in court during her murder trial

The lone holdout juror in the high-profile Lindsay Clancy trial is reportedly speaking out for the first time.

Michael Marcel of Fugitive TV on Youtube says that he has interviewed the juror, whose name is Michael Desronvil.

According to Marcel, Desronvil is a devout Catholic and Republican.

He says that Desronvil believes he was targeted because he does not hold the same political views as the other members of the jury — who all voted to acquit Clancy.

Watch this clip from Fugitive TV:

🚨
WOW!

According to Michael, the lone holdout juror from the Lindsay Clancy trial said in his phone interview with Fugitive TV that he feels like he’s being targeted because he’s a Black Republican with conservative views.

It’s all starting to make a lot more sense now. Poor… pic.twitter.com/aqDPkllgve

— Gina Milan (@ginamilan_) September 16, 2026


Marcel also shared some photos allegedly given to him by the juror and warned folks not to send money to anyone pretending to be him:

This is the Lindsay Clancy juror Michael. He sent me these photos. Do not send anyone any money that is not him. pic.twitter.com/H6DYEUxmpV

— Fugitive TV (@FugitiveTV_Live) September 16, 2026


This absolute hero was doxxed by the left, and the media ran hit pieces on him — all because he would not let a mother who strangled her three kids to death off the hook.

An official GiveSendGo campaign was set up for him, and it’s already raised over $250K.

During his phone interview with Michael Marcel, Desronvil shared his side of the story about what really went down in the deliberation room before a mistrial was declared in the Clancy case.

He also cleared up some of the media’s smears against him.

Life News reported further:

The holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial has broken his silence, saying eight fellow jurors behaved like “activists” who wanted her found not guilty from the first day of deliberations

He said that even as three young children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, lay at the center of the case due to their brutal murders, other jurors wanted to exonerate Clancy almost immediately.

Judge William Sullivan ended the trial after the jury of nine women and three men spent more than 38 hours deliberating and reported it could not reach a unanimous verdict. Notes given to the court indicated an 11-1 split.

Clancy faces three counts of murder in the killings of her children.

Desronvil said he concluded she was guilty based on the evidence presented in court. He told Marcel he believed she was not insane at the time and knew what she was doing.

Marcel said Desronvil described the jury’s opening positions this way: from day one, eight jurors were going for not guilty, two were for guilty, and two had not made up their minds.

“He said that from day one, he said eight of them were going for Lindsay Clancy not guilty. That was on day one. Eight were going not guilty. Two were for guilty. And two didn’t know. They didn’t make up their mind,” Marcel recounted. “He said to him those eight felt like they were activists. … Every day they would vote. … The eight that felt that Lindsay was not guilty were trying to convince the other four, ‘Hey, Lindsay is not guilty.’”

Desronvil referred to those eight jurors as “activists” and said they wanted a “not guilty” result from the start. He said he and one other juror voted guilty, but the second juror “caved in at the last moment.”

For those who believe the law must answer for the taking of a child’s life, the account is stark. According to the holdout, a majority of the panel was already pushing to clear Clancy before the evidence had been fully weighed in the jury room. The three children would not have received justice had those jurors gotten their way in court.

Desronvil said the evidence showed their mother knew what she was doing.

Desronvil, whom Marcel described as well-spoken, kind and Catholic, said he believes he is being targeted because he is a Black Republican with conservative values and served with many Democratic voters. He has not appeared on camera. His name spread online after the mistrial. He has been doxxed; he said his life has been threatened and people have stalked his house.

He also addressed questions about his background.

“I did not lie on the questionnaire,” he told Fugitive TV, saying he disclosed a past arrest when selected.

A 2021 charge that he assaulted his then-wife was later dismissed. He said he has not been convicted in connection with those 2021 events and that some claims circulating about him were incomplete, partly true or false.

Supporters have called him a hero who “held his seat” rather than join a rush to exonerate a mother charged in the killings of her three children.

If you want to watch FugitiveTV’s full video sharing the lone holdout juror’s thoughts, I have it for you right here:

Continue reading...

[ H/T WLT Report ]

Comments

There are no comments to display
Back
Top