JUST IN: Patrick Clancy Expecting First Child With New Wife Rachel Danis And I Have Two Questions

News just in that Patrick Clancy (who for anyone who has been living under a rock is the guy who’s first wife Lindsey Clancy viciously killed her three small children by strangling them) is now expecting a new child with his new wife.

See here:

Patrick Clancy is expecting first child with wife Rachel Danis. https://t.co/8oefv7ccEg pic.twitter.com/0evhU6rXnx

— TMZ (@TMZ) September 21, 2026

Click to expand...

And now let’s address two things that might be coming to your mind right now…

First: isn’t that really fast? Too soon?

Ehhh, not really.

You have to understand that although the trial just ended, Lindsay Clancy killed her three children on January 24, 2023, at the family’s home in Duxbury, Massachusetts.

So over three years ago.

Which STILL may be too soon for some people, but it’s not as if it was just months ago as it might feel at first blush.

Second: does the new wife look EXACTLY like the old wife?

Here are the two side-by-side so you can see what you think, new wife on the left, old wife on the right:



Look, I suffer from Face-Blindness, the same ailment that Brad Pitt and many others suffer from, so I’m perhaps not the best person to judge this, but they sure look similar to me.

I guess he has a type?

I can’t judge the man, but if it were me I think I’d either be NEVER getting married again or getting married to someone who looked 180 degrees different than the first one?

I’m not the only one seeing it:



ChatGPT also thinks so.

Here’s what it told me:

Visually, they do look fairly similar, particularly in the face. I’d describe the resemblance as moderately strong, but I can’t determine from photos whether they’re the same person.

The strongest similarities I see are the long/narrow facial shape, prominent cheekbones, relatively narrow jaw/chin, dark hair, eyebrow shape/placement, and the general proportions between the eyes, nose, and mouth. Their smiles also produce somewhat similar cheek and mouth contours.

There are apparent differences around the eyes, nose, and lower face, although the comparison is substantially complicated by the photographs: the first is a high-quality, controlled close-up with makeup and neutral expression, while the second is lower-resolution, taken from above, outdoors, and has a broad smile. Those factors can make the same facial structure look surprisingly different—or make two different people look more alike.

So purely as a visual resemblance comparison: yes, I can definitely see why you’d think they look alike.


As a subjective visual-resemblance rating—not a biometric identity match—I’d put them at roughly 75% similar.

The strongest overlap is in the overall face shape, high cheekbones, narrow jaw/chin, dark hair, eyebrow area, and general nose/mouth proportions. The second photo’s angle, smile, and much lower image quality make a tighter comparison difficult.

So if 100% = virtually indistinguishable facial appearance, my visual impression is about 75%.

Click to expand...

You can see more here:


And here:


RELATED REPORTS:

UNREAL: Lindsey Clancy’s Attorney Asks The Judge To INVESTIGATE The Lone Holdout Juror!

Click to expand...

WATCH: Patrick Clancy Says Lindsay Never Asked For Forgiveness After Killing Their Three Children

Click to expand...

Judge Judy Weighs In On Lindsay Clancy Murder Case And Gives Major Warning

Click to expand...

Judge Judy has weighed in on the Lindsay Clancy murder case.

Former TV personality, Judy Sheindlin, was recently asked by a TMZ reporter what her thoughts were on the Lindsay Clancy murder case and the former TV Judge responded “that there is no question that she (Lindsay) killed her children.”

She then revealed she believess there’s a “real danger” to society if the prosecutors decide to not retry the case.

Fox News provided further details on Judge Judy’s thoughts on the Lindsay Clancy murder case:

Judge Judy Sheindlin weighed in Thursday on the closely watched Lindsay Clancy murder case following its mistrial, warning there could be a “danger” in prosecutors deciding not to retry the Massachusetts mother accused of killing her three young children.

The 83-year-old judge and television personality was asked by TMZ whether Clancy should face another trial after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict earlier this month.

“I think there’s a danger in that, in not retrying,” Sheindlin responded.

Sheindlin, who launched the popular syndicated show “Judge Judy,” which aired for 25 seasons, was also asked about her view on the outcome of the trial after the jury’s deliberations ended in a reported 11-1 split in favor of finding Clancy not criminally responsible.

“I can’t give you a two-minute answer on that,” Sheindlin said.

She was then asked whether she believed Clancy should have been found guilty.

“There’s no question, my dear, that she killed her children,” Sheindlin said. “The only question is, is there an excuse for it? Make up your own mind on that one.”

Click to expand...

Watch Judge Judy here:


The New York Post reported Dr. Phil has also weighed in on the case:

Dr. Phil McGraw on Saturday weighed in on the Lindsay Clancy trial, one day after the judge declared a mistrial when the jurors were unable to reach a unanimous verdict in the killings of her three children.

The defense team of the mother who admitted to strangling her three children to death in 2023 claims the 36-year-old was suffering from postpartum psychosis and wasn’t in control of her actions when she killed her children.

McGraw told Fox News anchor Aishah Hasnie on “Fox News Live” Saturday that Clancy’s children — Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and Callan, 8 months — “are the real folks we need to give our attention to here. Three innocent children did lose their lives, and you can never explain these situations away simply.”

He said it also concerns him when mental illness gets depicted in the courtroom, it becomes “kind of a political, ideological football that’s used to try to skew something or is kind of debunked by another side rather than looking at what actually took place.”

Click to expand...

Dr. Phil later gave a prediction on what he believes will happen next:

"Everybody is treating the criminal as the victim, and the victims have become somewhat invisible."

That was the DA after the Lindsay Clancy trial.

Here's my prediction for what happens next… pic.twitter.com/GXFIpsgmRH

— Dr. Phil (@DrPhil) September 17, 2026

Click to expand...

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

The post JUST IN: Patrick Clancy Expecting First Child With New Wife Rachel Danis And I Have Two Questions appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Continue reading...

[H/T 100PercentFedUp]