![If you know ANYONE who has cancer, WATCH THIS NOW! [From Noah]](https://wltreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/11/john-richardsons-cancer-book-showcase.png)
House Republicans are making a choice today that will define how they fight through the next two years.
Behind closed doors, GOP members and members-elect will cast secret ballots for the next leader of their conference. The contest is between two of the most recognizable Republicans in Washington: Jim Jordan and Steve Scalise.
This promotion comes with real power.
The winner will inherit a battered conference, a Democratic House majority, an incoming Speaker Hakeem Jeffries, and a long list of investigations aimed at President Trump and his administration.
The Associated Press reports that Republicans are voting Tuesday afternoon after hearing directly from both candidates in the morning. Mike Johnson is stepping aside from leadership, leaving the party to choose between Scalise’s experience inside the leadership structure and Jordan’s combative record on oversight.
The race is expected to be close. Scalise has spent more than a decade in senior leadership, while Jordan co-founded the House Freedom Caucus and has chaired the Judiciary Committee for four years.
They also carry history. Scalise defeated Jordan in the 2023 conference vote for speaker nominee, only to withdraw when he could not assemble enough support on the House floor; Jordan then failed in multiple ballots before Republicans turned to Johnson.
The job they want is very different from the one Republicans were fighting over three years ago.
The next GOP leader will not control the House floor or committee gavels. He will have to keep a smaller conference together, protect the Trump administration from aggressive Democratic oversight, and build a credible route back to the majority in 2028.
NPR describes the choice as a referendum on the party’s direction after Democrats flipped more than 40 seats. Former acting Speaker Patrick McHenry said the internal decision will become part of a much larger public conversation about what the Republican Party should be.
Scalise is selling continuity, fundraising power, and the ability to unite members with sharply different priorities. He has promised a “conservative and consensus-driven” approach, arguing that a disciplined minority can still force difficult votes, negotiate on must-pass bills, and lay out a positive agenda.
Jordan is pitching a break from the team that presided over the defeat. His case is built around confrontation, communication, and a willingness to use every oversight fight to expose Democrats and defend President Trump.
The most revealing part of this race is that both men agree on the danger ahead.
Democrats will control subpoenas, hearing schedules, and committee agendas. Republicans expect investigations to reach beyond the White House and into Cabinet offices, Trump’s family, conservative organizations, and businesses aligned with the administration.
In his official letter to House Republicans, Jordan argues that the conference cannot survive by reacting to one crisis at a time. He calls for a leadership team that is active, direct, and prepared to go on offense against an “emboldened and energetic” Democratic majority.
Jordan’s strongest claim is his record in the arena that will dominate the next Congress. He says he knows the Democratic oversight playbook and is prepared for the coming investigations because he has spent years battling through high-profile hearings.
His challenge is proving that the same aggressive style can unite a conference and win back swing districts. Republicans need a fighter, but they also need a leader who can turn the fight into votes outside the safest red seats.
Scalise faces the opposite question.
He can point to fundraising, legislative wins, and years of relationship-building. But members angry over the scale of the midterm loss must decide whether elevating another figure from the existing leadership team looks like accountability or simply rearranging the nameplates.
President Trump has not publicly endorsed either candidate in this race. That leaves Republican members to make the choice without an explicit directive from the man who still dominates the party.
Whoever wins will need more than a secret-ballot majority today.
He will need a strategy that protects the administration, keeps Republicans from splintering under pressure, speaks clearly to voters who walked away, and makes the minority feel like a temporary setback rather than a permanent destination.
That is the real choice: the tested coalition-builder or the battle-tested investigator.
House Republicans are about to decide which kind of fight they believe can bring them back.
This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.
The post Jim Jordan and Steve Scalise Battle for Control of House Republicans appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.
Continue reading...
[H/T 100PercentFedUp]
![If you know ANYONE who has cancer, WATCH THIS NOW! [From Noah]](https://100percentfedup.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/11/aaaj.jpg)
