Israel’s election just turned the country’s political map upside down.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party finished as the largest individual party, but the bloc that has kept him in power fell well short of the 61 seats needed to control the Knesset.
With the vote count completed ahead of formal certification, Netanyahu’s right-wing and religious bloc stood at 53 seats. The opposition bloc led by former military chief Gadi Eisenkot held 48, while Arab-led parties surged to a record 19.
That is the political earthquake.
Netanyahu was not decisively defeated. Eisenkot did not win a governing majority.
And the parties that many establishment figures treated as an afterthought may now determine who can form Israel’s next government.
That early reaction captured how quickly Arab-led parties became central to the post-election conversation. The final seat count and any coalition commitments must still be judged by official results and what party leaders actually agree to do.
The election produced Israel’s highest turnout in nearly three decades. That surge mattered most in Arab communities, where voters helped the Joint List and Ra’am reach a combined 19 seats — a new record.
Those seats now sit at the center of the coalition math.
The Associated Press reports that the election was widely seen as a referendum on Netanyahu’s long rule and the direction of the country after years of war and political turmoil. The outlet notes that the outcome leaves Israel facing weeks of bargaining, with another election possible if no one can assemble a majority.
Here is where the result gets complicated.
Eisenkot’s 48-seat bloc could theoretically move past 61 with support from Arab-led parties. But several opposition factions spent the campaign ruling out that partnership, and those promises will now be tested under enormous pressure.
Netanyahu faces a different version of the same problem. His bloc is eight seats short, which means he would need to pull opposition lawmakers into a new arrangement, break apart a rival faction or find another coalition formula that looked unlikely before the votes were counted.
Yair Golan, leader of Israel’s Democrats party, declared that Netanyahu had lost when the anti-Netanyahu and Arab-led parties were counted together.
But counting seats on paper is not the same as building a government. A coalition needs parties willing to sit together, accept a common program and survive a confidence vote.
That remains unresolved.
The election also took a more volatile turn after allegations of foreign interference surfaced.
Israeli President Isaac Herzog said he had spoken with Central Elections Committee Chairman Justice Noam Sohlberg and Shin Bet chief David Zini as the allegations spread. He called the integrity of Israel’s elections a supreme democratic value and said every piece of evidence and every allegation must be investigated fully.
Herzog also stressed that the official results would be presented only after the legally required process is complete. He said he would then begin consultations with the elected factions and approach that responsibility with an open mind.
At the same time, the president warned political leaders not to use disputed claims to stain an entire community that exercised its democratic right to vote. His message was straightforward: investigate specific evidence, hold anyone responsible if wrongdoing is proven, and protect public confidence in the election while that work proceeds.
Likud has alleged that the election was stolen through wrongdoing in Arab polling stations. Election officials have not established widespread fraud, and those claims remain unproven while investigators review the evidence that was submitted.
The Associated Press reports that the Central Elections Committee asked Israel’s domestic security service to examine suspicions of foreign funding or interference. Qatar denied involvement, and the investigation has not produced a public finding that changes the vote count.
Formal results are expected to be certified next week. Herzog will then consult the parties and choose the lawmaker he believes has the best chance to build a government.
Netanyahu remains very much alive politically. Likud is still the largest party, and he has decades of experience turning difficult parliamentary math into power.
But the old coalition no longer has the numbers. Eisenkot cannot take power without partners who disagree sharply over security, religion, national identity and whether Arab parties should help govern.
So Israel has its result — but not yet its next government.
The voters broke the old majority. Now the political class has to figure out what replaces it.
This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.
The post Israel Election Results Trigger a Political Earthquake appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.
Continue reading...
[H/T 100PercentFedUp]