• Welcome to the New Conservative Angle!

    We're excited to introduce a new era for our readership.

    For years, Conservative Angle has served as a clearinghouse for news, commentary, and analysis from across the conservative movement. Thousands of readers have visited these pages to stay informed, discover new voices, and keep pace with the stories shaping our nation and our world.

    Today, we are building on that foundation.

    The new Conservative Angle is more than a news aggregator. It is a community.

    Our mission remains the same: to provide access to important stories, encourage informed discussion, and promote the free exchange of ideas. But now, readers have a place to participate, share perspectives, ask questions, and openly and respectfully engage directly with fellow conservatives and independent thinkers.

    As Conservative Angle grows, we will continue adding new features, new content, and new ways for readers to participate. The site will evolve over time based on the interests, ideas, and contributions from the community.

    Whether you are a longtime visitor or discovering Conservative Angle for the first time, we invite you to become part of the conversation.

    Register for an account, introduce yourself to the community, and join the discussions that matter most to you. Together, we can create a place where news is not merely consumed, but examined, debated, and understood.

    Thank you for your patience during our transition and for your continued support.

    Welcome to the new Conservative Angle.

    — The Conservative Angle Team

Democrats resist Trump’s push to add Iran to bipartisan Russia sanctions bill

blumenthal-iran-russia-sanctions-bill.jpg


Democrats are resisting President Donald Trump’s push to add Iran to a bipartisan Russia sanctions bill, complicating what had appeared to be an easy Senate victory before lawmakers leave Washington for their summer recess.

The GOP-led Senate could advance the long-stalled Russia sanctions package as early as this week in honor of the proposal’s lead Republican sponsor, the late Sen. Lindsey Graham. But Republicans are increasingly embracing Trump’s call to include Iran, while Democrats insist the two issues remain separate, raising questions about whether lawmakers can pass the bill before the August recess.

“The Russia sanctions bill is the product of painstaking — sometimes painful — negotiations over many months,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), who worked on the legislation with Graham and is a leading co-sponsor, told the Washington Examiner. “My personal view is that it should be passed as is. If there are additional changes, which may be very worthwhile, they should be considered separately.”

Republicans are lining up behind Trump’s request, made via Truth Social over the weekend, to pair the two after the U.S. death toll from the Iran war climbed to 17 in recent days following three troop casualties from Iranian attacks. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton (R-AR) and Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), both in leadership, quickly backed the idea.

Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH), a potential successor to Scott as the next chairman of the Senate GOP’s campaign arm, went a step further.

“I won’t support the bill unless it includes Iran,” Moreno told the Washington Examiner. “Why wouldn’t they include Iran? … If we’re going to do it, let’s do it.”

In the days before his death earlier this month, Graham revealed that his latest Russia sanctions bill with Blumenthal received sign-off from Trump. It would impose new economic penalties on Russia and its top leaders, including tariffs on the country’s energy sector and some of the largest purchasers of Russian oil and natural gas, in an effort to squeeze revenue funding Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war against Ukraine.

TRUMP URGES IRAN’S ADDITION TO RUSSIAN SANCTIONS BILL: ‘WHAT LINDSEY WANTED’

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) also endorsed including Iran sanctions ahead of current ones expiring at year’s end, but cautioned that the math and limited floor time in the coming weeks before Congress heads out on August recess could be tricky. Graham’s revised proposal already has more than the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster, but it’s unclear how much GOP support could deteriorate without Iran and whether enough Democrats could find swift agreement on additional language.

“I personally am in favor of that,” Thune said of adding Iran. “It’s going to come down to what gets 60 [votes].”

Continue reading...

[ H/T Washington Examiner ]

Comments

There are no comments to display
Back
Top