Guest Post by Hardscrabble Farmer
Both are choices about identity based on sexual behavior, first and foremost above everything else. These numbers prove it. 100 years ago, there was no advantage to someone exhibiting abnormal sexual behavior openly and so it was a statistically insignificant identification. As social mores morphed and turned it into a celebratory and positive lifestyle ‘choice’, two things happened, those who were inclined to focus on sexual activity as a pastime inclined in the direction of homosexuality/bisexuality/onanism and those who were damaged by childhood sexual exploitation, or homosexual reproduction were now given license to remain broken and not to correct those behaviors.
Homosexuality has far more in common with overeating than family formation. We all know a few homosexual couples that mimic normal couples, but they are in the minority of that community. Most are people who use sexuality like drugs or food, as a way to distract themselves from doing the work required to fix whatever is broken inside themselves, which is in most cases some sort of childhood sexual exploitation or molestation.
During the time I was doing comedy I crossed paths with a lot of damaged people who inclined towards hyper-sexualized behaviors, both gays and loose women. The one thing most of them shared in common was childhood sexual exploitation. People can pretend all they like that it’s genetic, but experience and common sense would indicate otherwise. What reproductive advantage does homosexuality confer on a species other than extinction?
Why would nature encode that in your genetics if reproduction is the desired outcome? It simply doesn’t ring true that it is something you are born as rather than a maladjustment. Our social systems committed a massive error in normalizing these behaviors and it has revealed a deep illness within the species itself, probably concerning maladjustments at the meta-level, like industrial and technological society removing human beings from a natural life tied to sunshine, land, seasons, family, etc.
I‘m just guessing at it, but it is clear that the entire medical and scientific structures are controlled by something above them and pushed into mainstreaming sexual maladjustments rather than remedying them. Remember that 50 years ago the American Psychiatric Association considered homosexuality a disorder, while today it considers anyone who objects to it to be mentally ill. It’s one thing to refine a position over time a few degrees one way or the other, but when it is a 180-degree reversal you know you are dealing with something other than science driving the narrative.
You become what you think are and what you work towards. Heterosexuality isn’t something you ever see people out in the streets throwing parades about or flying flags from the front porch to promote because it isn’t central to their identity. They are fathers and husbands first which encompasses a far larger spectrum of behaviors and responsibilities, near the bottom of the list being the actual sexual attraction.
This by no means excludes people who use heterosexual sexual behavior in the same fashion outside of family formation. Sluts and players, or whatever they call them these days are just as damaged and malfunctioning. The Cornell 7 incident, the dramatic rise of pornography, people like Bonnie Blue or the Andrew Tate types are every bit as degenerate and maladjusted as a closeted Lindsay Graham or a Chris Jenner. They have something wrong with their psyche, and they incline towards sexualized behavior rather than towards the hard work required to overcome whatever damage they must repair to live a normal life.
These are aberrant behaviors, clearly. Those who choose these behaviors must square them with the norm that they see all around them or make the choice to alter their behavioral maladjustment. One doesn’t have to practice sodomy to survive, and as with any other physical or mental or emotional limitation or damage, can find ways to mitigate it in order to lead a healthier life.
I feel real sympathy towards most of these people as I would with someone who was crippled or blind, but unlike those they can change if they want to.
After all, it is a choice.
Tweet
Continue reading...
[ H/T The Burning Platform ]
Both are choices about identity based on sexual behavior, first and foremost above everything else. These numbers prove it. 100 years ago, there was no advantage to someone exhibiting abnormal sexual behavior openly and so it was a statistically insignificant identification. As social mores morphed and turned it into a celebratory and positive lifestyle ‘choice’, two things happened, those who were inclined to focus on sexual activity as a pastime inclined in the direction of homosexuality/bisexuality/onanism and those who were damaged by childhood sexual exploitation, or homosexual reproduction were now given license to remain broken and not to correct those behaviors.
Homosexuality has far more in common with overeating than family formation. We all know a few homosexual couples that mimic normal couples, but they are in the minority of that community. Most are people who use sexuality like drugs or food, as a way to distract themselves from doing the work required to fix whatever is broken inside themselves, which is in most cases some sort of childhood sexual exploitation or molestation.
During the time I was doing comedy I crossed paths with a lot of damaged people who inclined towards hyper-sexualized behaviors, both gays and loose women. The one thing most of them shared in common was childhood sexual exploitation. People can pretend all they like that it’s genetic, but experience and common sense would indicate otherwise. What reproductive advantage does homosexuality confer on a species other than extinction?
Why would nature encode that in your genetics if reproduction is the desired outcome? It simply doesn’t ring true that it is something you are born as rather than a maladjustment. Our social systems committed a massive error in normalizing these behaviors and it has revealed a deep illness within the species itself, probably concerning maladjustments at the meta-level, like industrial and technological society removing human beings from a natural life tied to sunshine, land, seasons, family, etc.
I‘m just guessing at it, but it is clear that the entire medical and scientific structures are controlled by something above them and pushed into mainstreaming sexual maladjustments rather than remedying them. Remember that 50 years ago the American Psychiatric Association considered homosexuality a disorder, while today it considers anyone who objects to it to be mentally ill. It’s one thing to refine a position over time a few degrees one way or the other, but when it is a 180-degree reversal you know you are dealing with something other than science driving the narrative.
You become what you think are and what you work towards. Heterosexuality isn’t something you ever see people out in the streets throwing parades about or flying flags from the front porch to promote because it isn’t central to their identity. They are fathers and husbands first which encompasses a far larger spectrum of behaviors and responsibilities, near the bottom of the list being the actual sexual attraction.
This by no means excludes people who use heterosexual sexual behavior in the same fashion outside of family formation. Sluts and players, or whatever they call them these days are just as damaged and malfunctioning. The Cornell 7 incident, the dramatic rise of pornography, people like Bonnie Blue or the Andrew Tate types are every bit as degenerate and maladjusted as a closeted Lindsay Graham or a Chris Jenner. They have something wrong with their psyche, and they incline towards sexualized behavior rather than towards the hard work required to overcome whatever damage they must repair to live a normal life.
These are aberrant behaviors, clearly. Those who choose these behaviors must square them with the norm that they see all around them or make the choice to alter their behavioral maladjustment. One doesn’t have to practice sodomy to survive, and as with any other physical or mental or emotional limitation or damage, can find ways to mitigate it in order to lead a healthier life.
I feel real sympathy towards most of these people as I would with someone who was crippled or blind, but unlike those they can change if they want to.
After all, it is a choice.
Tweet
Continue reading...
[ H/T The Burning Platform ]
