I’ve defended Candace Owens many times over the years, saying she brings a voice to the discussion that is needed.
But this one might be a bridge too far.
Watch here as Candace says she’s made up her mind and “obviously” Lindsay Clancy (the woman who strangled her three small children to death) is “not guilty”.
Wow.
Watch here:
More here:
Ok, so a few thoughts here.
If Candace is saying Big Pharma and her prescribing doctors have a lot of blame to go around here, I can agree with that.
I think Big Pharma is largely anti-human and basically evil.
But that doesn’t put me anywhere in the “Lindsay Clancy is not guilty” camp. No way.
Two things can be true at the same time: (1) Big Pharma and her doctors may have culpability here, and (2) Lindsay Clancy is also culpable and should be found guilty. After all, she admitted it!
As far as I can see from the evidence, this was not a snap decision where she just broke suddenly.
All evidence I can see suggests she planned this out and I believe we call that premeditation.
That’s the end of the case for me, but I’d love to know what you think.
Is Candace right or has she finally completely lost it?
More here:
Continue reading...
[ H/T WLT Report ]
