• Welcome to the New Conservative Angle!

    We're excited to introduce a new era for our readership.

    For years, Conservative Angle has served as a clearinghouse for news, commentary, and analysis from across the conservative movement. Thousands of readers have visited these pages to stay informed, discover new voices, and keep pace with the stories shaping our nation and our world.

    Today, we are building on that foundation.

    The new Conservative Angle is more than a news aggregator. It is a community.

    Our mission remains the same: to provide access to important stories, encourage informed discussion, and promote the free exchange of ideas. But now, readers have a place to participate, share perspectives, ask questions, and openly and respectfully engage directly with fellow conservatives and independent thinkers.

    As Conservative Angle grows, we will continue adding new features, new content, and new ways for readers to participate. The site will evolve over time based on the interests, ideas, and contributions from the community.

    Whether you are a longtime visitor or discovering Conservative Angle for the first time, we invite you to become part of the conversation.

    Register for an account, introduce yourself to the community, and join the discussions that matter most to you. Together, we can create a place where news is not merely consumed, but examined, debated, and understood.

    Thank you for your patience during our transition and for your continued support.

    Welcome to the new Conservative Angle.

    — The Conservative Angle Team

Appeals court denies Biden bid to block memoir tapes’ release in classified information dispute

AP26169692270649.jpg


An appeals court on Monday denied former President Joe Biden’s bid to block the release of dozens of hours of audio recordings he made while working on his memoir.

The tapes are being held by the Justice Department and have been the subject of a lengthy legal battle over concerns that Biden disclosed classified information in them during private conversations with his ghostwriter, Mark Zwonitzer. The Heritage Foundation is seeking to release the audio to the public, but Biden’s team has sought to block the DOJ from doing so.

A divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled against Biden this week. The court denied the former president’s request for a temporary block while he presses the merits of his legal challenge to the disclosure. In a 2-1 decision, the panel stayed the opinion until Aug. 3 to allow time for further appeals.

“We conclude that Biden has not shown a likelihood that the requested materials must be withheld from disclosure,” the judges wrote.

The tapes attracted attention in 2023, when special counsel Robert Hur obtained the tapes at the Justice Department and began combing through the recordings after he was appointed to investigate concerns that Biden disclosed classified information or kept it at private residences. At the time, Hur released a report finding that, multiple times, “Mr. Biden read classified notes from national security meetings to Zwonitzer nearly verbatim,” as he wrote his 2017 memoir, Promise Me Dad: A Year of Hope, Hardship and Purpose. However, the special counsel opted out of bringing criminal charges against Biden, explaining that there was a high probability that the Justice Department would not be able to prove Biden’s intent beyond a reasonable doubt.

The Heritage Foundation has argued that there was significant public interest in releasing all the tapes to provide transparency as to why Hur declined to file criminal charges against Biden in the classified documents case.

REPUBLICANS BUILD MIDTERM CONVENTION AROUND TRUMP TO BOLSTER TURNOUT

U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, ruled in June that the Justice Department could release the tapes to the Heritage Foundation.

After Biden’s lawyers immediately filed for an injunction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit temporarily blocked the DOJ in early July from releasing the tapes, stating that the ruling intended only to preserve the status quo while it reviewed Biden’s request for a longer injunction pending appeal and “should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits.”

Continue reading...

[ H/T Washington Examiner ]

Comments

There are no comments to display
Back
Top